AI Archives - 糖心VLOG Press /news/category/artificial-intelligence/ Tue, 09 Jun 2026 16:04:16 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 /wp-content/uploads/2025/10/favicon-1.png AI Archives - 糖心VLOG Press /news/category/artificial-intelligence/ 32 <糖心VLOG>32 New research shows teenagers are divided over AI use for schoolwork /news/new-research-shows-teenagers-are-divided-over-ai-use-for-schoolwork/ Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:43:22 +0000 /?p=6321 Our new research report, Navigating AI in Education, surveyed nearly 4,000 pupils in UK schools.

The post New research shows teenagers are divided over AI use for schoolwork appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>

According to findings in exploring pupils’ perspectives on the role of AI in classrooms, teenagers are unclear over appropriate use of AI in their schoolwork.

We conducted research with almost 4,000 13-18-year-olds across the UK, revealing the different approaches that young people take to using AI in their schoolwork, and what roles they see AI playing education鈥攂oth for them and their teachers.

The report follows on from , which was one of the first pieces of UK research to hear directly from young people regarding their views on AI in education.

Some of our key findings:

Appropriate use of AI is a grey area

While only four in 10 (44%) think it is cheating to use AI to complete all of their homework, almost one in five also think it is cheating to simply ask any AI tool to give them homework tips.

Students are calling for more support from schools

Just 15% of students stated they have been given enough guidance.

77% would like to see their teachers use AI to support their class in lessons

Key areas include using AI to make complex work easier to understand and lesson planning.

Pupils emphasize their teacher’s unique value

73% pointed to a skill their teacher has which AI can never replace, such as personability, empathy, and human understanding.

Using AI in written tasks

In our qualitative studies, students were asked to complete a simple written exercise and offered the choice of using a generative AI tool if they wished. Of those who had access to AI, almost three quarters (72%) decided not to use it. Of those who didn鈥檛 have access, less than a quarter (23%) said they would have liked to have used an AI tool if they had been able to do so.

Young people do not use AI as a default for homework

The qualitative studies mirror survey findings, which highlight that young people do not use AI as a default for their homework, with only one in four (24%) regularly seeking out AI tools. Furthermore, one in three (34%) only use AI tools to help with their homework if suggested by their teacherscompared to听just听13% who are influenced by their friends.

Students are more excited than worried over impact of AI on their education

Four in 10 students (39%) are more excited than worried about the impact of AI on their education, compared to 16% who said they were more concerned and less than one in three (30%) who felt neither way.

What helps students learn more effectively when using AI?

When asked what helps them learn more effectively when using AI, the majority expressed preferences for AI tools that suggested tasks they can do to help them understand the subject better (44%) or asked them questions to help them reach the answer on their own (41%), compared to just one in five wanting an AI tool to give them the answer straight away.

Dr Alexandra Tomescu

Head of Product AI

“Whilst the research highlights that the appropriate use of AI is still a grey area for students, 颈迟鈥檚reassuringto see young听people鈥檚sophisticatedattitude towards AI. Both the research and qualitative studies show AI is not necessarily a default for all students, and despite being excited about its impact on their education they still inherently value the role of their teachers and look to their school for guidance. It鈥檚 vital therefore that we support teachers with the resources and tools they need to responsibly guide their pupils and harness AI鈥檚 potential in the classroom.鈥

Read the full report on Navigating AI in Education , and find out more about our updated AI resources and guidance .

The post New research shows teenagers are divided over AI use for schoolwork appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>
Oxford Law Pro wins Gold for two SSP EPIC Awards /news/oxford-law-pro-wins-gold-in-two-2026-epic-awards/ Tue, 02 Jun 2026 13:06:53 +0000 /?p=6304 Oxford Law Pro, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, has won Gold in two 2026 EPIC Awards.

The post Oxford Law Pro wins Gold for two SSP EPIC Awards appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>

We have been recognized with two awards at the 2026 Society of Scholarly Publishing (SSP) EPIC Awards Celebration, held on 28 May in California.

, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, has won Gold in two categories: Hosting Platform Features and Branding.

The celebrate the remarkable achievements of individuals and teams who are advancing scholarly publishing through creativity, collaboration, and innovation. The Hosting Platform Features category highlights technical innovations that improve how scholarly content is hosted, accessed, and experienced, while the Branding category recognizes outstanding efforts to build and maintain a strong brand identity in scholarly publishing.

Mirkka Jokelainen, Product Portfolio Manager, said:

鈥淚t鈥檚 incredibly rewarding to see Oxford Law Pro recognised across both platform innovation and branding. These awards reflect the collaboration and commitment of colleagues across OUP and our work with Silverchair and Baxter & Bailey. Our shared focus was to deliver real value to legal researchers and professionals.From the AI Research Assistant through to the product鈥檚 identity and positioning, the goal was to create something that is both highly functional and clearly signals what is unique about what OUP can offer. The SSP EPIC Gold Awards celebrate this work.鈥

About the platform

Launched last year, Oxford Law Pro听brings together more than 9,000 journal articles and over 600 award-winning, peer-reviewed books from our portfolio of authoritative and timely legal analysis, all on our Oxford Academic platform.听

Oxford Law Pro听is powered by a conversational AI research assistant,听, making legal research more efficient without compromising on accuracy. Unlike generic AI search tools,听Oxford Law Pro听employs retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks specifically tuned for legal content, ensuring responses are grounded exclusively in OUP鈥檚 authoritative materials.

The platform equips legal professionals with tools that match the realities of modern practice, and by reducing time spent on initial source identification, the AI assistant allows them to allocate more time to substantive analysis, strategic thinking, and client service.

For many years, we have served the academic market with legal research materials, developing a reputation for publishing the highest quality research from globally respected authors.听. Backed by our research and workshops, a process supported by legal technology expert Jenifer Swallow, we developed product branding and messaging to both reflect our established reputation and resonate with practitioners who may not have encountered OUP before.听

We worked with design agency Baxter & Bailey to develop a strong, modern visual identity, messaging, and a suite of imagery to bring Oxford Law Pro听alive. Congratulations to all involved for this industry recognition.

Find out more about听.

The post Oxford Law Pro wins Gold for two SSP EPIC Awards appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>
Shaping Plan Assist AI tool with our global network of teachers /news/shaping-plan-assist-ai-tool-with-our-global-network-of-teachers/ Thu, 09 Apr 2026 15:23:12 +0000 /?p=6204 Plan Assist is designed to help teachers save time, personalize learning, and navigate challenges faced in the classroom.听

The post Shaping Plan Assist AI tool with our global network of teachers appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>

We are pleased to announce the launch of the first in a series of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, designed to help teachers save time, personalize learning, and navigate some of the biggest challenges faced in the classroom.听

The tool,听, has been developed in partnership with leading global edtech provider , combining our pedagogical expertise with advanced AI technology.

With resource generation at its core,听Plan Assist听works to help teachers to create custom materials, such as lesson plans, glossaries, flashcards, and much more. When generating questions and answers through Avallain鈥檚 technology, it leverages trusted OUP content in the prompts to produce high-quality, curriculum-aligned outputs. By simplifying the planning process, it helps to save time for teachers while delivering results tailored 鈥嬧嬧媐or鈥 them and their students.鈥

Ensuring value through teacher-led testing

Thetechnology that powers听Plan Assist听has already been recognized in major edtech awards, including BETT and the Learning Technology Awards.

Ahead of launch, we carried out a rigorous research and testing programme involving external subject matter experts, pilot trials with UK and international teachers, and extensive testing across four languages and multiple regions. This ensured the tool is robust, reliable, and provided real value for diverse classrooms, with participating teachers reporting听鈥媡hat听鈥媡he tool provides 鈥a range of resources to support a teacher successfully in the classroom with ideas, content,听and activities鈥澨and praising 鈥渋ts ability to instantly rewrite the same content for different audiences鈥.

Teacher voices driving more effective support

To reflect the realities of classroom life, we gathered feedback from our global teacher network to provide insights into the pressures they are currently facing and what they need from digital platforms to work more efficiently.

Across the responses, three challenges were highlighted in particular:听

  • not having enough time and feeling over-stretched (74%)听
  • mental health and wellbeing (55%)听
  • budget restrictions (54%)听

Alongside these pressures, teachers also outlined what an effective digital platform must offer to truly support their work. Teachers said they needed:听

  • The ability to download, adapt, and print ready鈥憁ade teaching and planning resources (56%)听
  • Tools to support front鈥憃f鈥慶lass teaching using high鈥憅uality presentations (54%)听
  • Functionality to听monitor听and report on student progress (52%)听
  • AI features to help create lesson plans and teaching resources (50%)听

They also emphasized the importance of:听

  • Immediate, actionable feedback for learners听
  • Auto鈥憁arking and data tracking听
  • Exam听board or subject specificity听
  • Student interactivity and engagement features听

These insights provided a clear picture of the challenges teachers face and the digital capabilities they value most, shaping the focus of our support to ensure all products and services make a real difference.

Fiona Fortes

International Product Director in our Education division

鈥淭eachers everywhere are being asked to do more with less time. By combining OUP鈥檚 trusted content with responsible, innovative AI capabilities, we are giving teachers practical tools that make a real difference in the classroom. At OUP, our focus has always been to lead with learning and ensure that technology is there to support teachers. Our key principles听remain听at the heart of everything we do 鈥 creating resources that have real purpose and a human in听the听loop, while听prioritizing听quality content and pedagogy and safe, ethical use.

As we continue to innovate, we look for opportunities where technology can deliver meaningful, positive change within education, when developed responsibly and in collaboration with our global teaching community.鈥

Monika Morawska, COO at听Avallain,听said:听

鈥淏uilding on our听expertise听in digital content creation technology and the rich feedback of the 60,000 highly engaged educators actively using our existing AI toolset听TeacherMatic, we are delighted to bring proven, practical, and ethical AI features to more teachers through Plan Assist. Our collaboration with OUP has been one of shared goals and values: putting humans, educational outcomes,听and creative, impactful content first.鈥

Plan Assist听will be available on听,听our online learning platform which supports teachers to save time and engage students with a range of resources. It will continue rolling out听to courses听in 2026.

You can find out more about Plan Assist .

The post Shaping Plan Assist AI tool with our global network of teachers appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>
Oxford Law Pro recognized for two 2026 EPIC Awards /news/oxford-law-pro-recognized-for-two-2026-epic-awards/ Thu, 09 Apr 2026 10:34:48 +0000 /?p=6211 Oxford Law Pro, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, has been nominated for two 2026 EPIC Awards.

The post Oxford Law Pro recognized for two 2026 EPIC Awards appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>

We have been named a finalist for two 2026 EPIC Awards, presented by the .听

, our knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers, has been nominated for consideration in two categories: Hosting Platform Features and Branding.

The Hosting Platform Features category highlights technical innovations that improve how scholarly content is hosted, accessed, and experienced, while the Branding category recognizes outstanding efforts to build and maintain a strong brand identity in scholarly publishing.

About the platform

Launched less that one year ago,听Oxford Law Pro brings together more than 9,000 journal articles and over 600 award-winning, peer-reviewed books from our portfolio of authoritative and timely legal analysis, all on our Oxford Academic platform.听

Oxford Law Pro is powered by a conversational AI research assistant, , making legal research more efficient without compromising on accuracy. Unlike generic AI search tools,听Oxford Law Pro employs retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) frameworks specifically tuned for legal content, ensuring responses are grounded exclusively in OUP’s authoritative materials.

The platform equips legal professionals with tools that match the realities of modern practice, and by reducing time spent on initial source identification, the AI assistant allows them to allocate more time to substantive analysis, strategic thinking, and client service.

The branding

For many years, we have served the academic market with legal research materials, developing a reputation for publishing the highest quality research from globally respected authors.听. Backed by our research and workshops, a process supported by legal technology expert Jenifer Swallow, we developed product branding and messaging to both reflect our established reputation and resonate with practitioners who may not have encountered OUP before.听

We worked with design agency Baxter & Bailey to develop a strong, modern logo and colour palette, bold and confident messaging, and a suite of imagery to bring Oxford Law Pro听alive.

“The breadth and quality of content on听Oxford Law Pro听is impressive and highly valuable for legal research.听Expert Essentials听stands out as a truly unique offering鈥擨 haven’t seen anything quite like it.”

Barrister, Hong Kong

Mirkka Jokelainen, Product Portfolio Manager, said:听

“These nominations recognize and reward the combined efforts of colleagues working with Oxford Law Pro over time. It reflects strong execution underpinned by clear direction, a deep understanding of our users and customers, and the ability to carry that insight through to high-quality delivery enriched by OUP expertise at every step.”

The EPIC Awards celebrate teams and individuals in the publishing, information technology, and communications sectors for their significant contributions to scholarly communication through innovation, creativity, and dedication. Winners of the will be announced on 28 May.听

You can find out more about Oxford Law Pro .

The post Oxford Law Pro recognized for two 2026 EPIC Awards appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>
Celebrating one year of Oxford Intersections /news/celebrating-one-year-of-oxford-intersections/ Tue, 24 Mar 2026 14:45:52 +0000 /?p=6073 We celebrate one year since the publication of the first collections of original interdisciplinary research within Oxford Intersections.

The post Celebrating one year of Oxford Intersections appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>

is our online interdisciplinary research resource, inviting academics and global experts to investigate the world’s most urgent and challenging subjects from all angles.

As we mark one year since the programme launched, we reflect on the over 300 articles we’ve published since then, covering over 250 subject areas from authors all over the world.

Intersections are organized by topic, inviting ideas from different disciplines to clash, complement, and counterpoint, prompting new viewpoints and questions. Explore some of the original content published so far in our first four topics:

AI in Society

Philipp Hacker, General Editor of AI in Society, and Chair for Law and Ethics of the Digital Society at European University Viadrina:

AI in Society听investigates AI’s pervasive influence on our economic, legal, personal, and cultural spheres. It takes a unique format, in which contributors from various disciplines collaborate to chart both the promises and societal challenges of AI, with particular attention to generative AI models and their global impact. From my perspective as its General Editor,听AI in Society aims to serve as a reliable reference point for ongoing debates on how to align technological innovation with fundamental rights and societal values.”

Read Philipp’s full article

Read some of the published research

Growing Up with AI: Redefining Responsible AI for Children of Generation Beta in the Majority World

Amir Rahdari

Authentic Artificial Love

Ariela Tubert, Justin Tiehen

English in LLMs: The Role of AI in Avoiding Cultural Homogenization

Mirko Farina, Andrea Lavazza

Borders

Alexander Diener, Professor of Geography at the University of Kansas, and Joshua Hagen, Dean of the College of Letters and Science, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, General Editors of Borders:

“We hope readers will engage Oxford Intersections: Borders to encounter new perspectives on a topics that is elemental to human experience and foundational to the form and function of power.”

Read some of the published research

Beyond Oral Tradition: Digitalizing Indigenous Environmental Knowledge for Climate Resilience in Africa

Dorcas Stella Shumba

Reconfiguring Borders: The Role of Conspiracy Theories in Shaping Knowledge and Information Flows in Online Discourse

Massimiliano Demata

Concepts from the Margins: Reimagining Governance and Belonging Through Border Children’s Lived Experiences

Ana Isabel Sandoval

Racism by Context

Meena Dhanda, General Editor of听Racism by Context听and Professor of Philosophy and Cultural Politics at the University of Wolverhampton:

“Combatting racism requires an unflinchingly analytical understanding of the roots, the history, the manifestation, the mechanisms, the proliferation, and the entanglement of its many forms within institutions and practices across all spheres of human interaction.听Racism by Context has undertaken this enormous challenge by bringing into conversation cutting-edge research from different global locations.”

Read some of the published research

Hair Discrimination and the Racialization of Black Young People’s Bodies: A Critical Analysis of Racism in U.K. School Settings

Siobhan O’Neill, Karis Campion, Sweta Rajan-Rankin

Soul Circuitry: Chronicles of Cyborgian Intelligence in Afrofuturism

Nettrice Gaskins

‘You are Nathan F*cking Shelley!’: Orientalism, White Saviourism, and the Radicalization of Nate in Ted Lasso

Adam Ehsan Ali, Matt Ventresca

Social Media in Society and Culture

Laeeq Khan, General Editor of Social Media in Society and Culture and Associate Professor in the School of Media Arts & Studies at Ohio University:

“Addressing today’s most pressing challenges requires a new approach to thinking. An interdisciplinary transformative approach can advance knowledge by exploiting and harmonizing the strengths of various disciplines within a unified framework. This approach deepens our collective understanding by bringing together the disparate and sometimes contradictory perspectives of many disciplines, all of which offer valuable insights.”

Read some of the published research

Sharenting on Instagram: A Study of Emotional Well-Being and Child Safety

P V Chandana, Velayutham Chandrasekharan, Tamilselvi Natarajan

Gaming on Social Media: An X- and YouTube-Driven Social Network Analysis of Minecraft Conversations

Mohd Ali Samsudin, Goh Kok Ming

Functional Aspects of Ritual in Digital Religion

Antonio Salvati

What’s coming next

In addition to continually developing our published topics, in the next year we’ll be launched intersections for听Environmental Change and Human Experience,听Gender Justice,听Climate Adaptation, and听Cultures of Waste, with many more to come in the following years.

Discover the full collection .

The post Celebrating one year of Oxford Intersections appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>
Offering AI-powered interactive revision with Oxford Revise Exam Tutor /news/ai-powered-interactive-revision-with-oxford-revise-exam-tutor/ Mon, 19 May 2025 13:27:49 +0000 /?p=5118 Oxford Revise Exam Tutor, powered by Atypical AI's ExamJam platform, offers GCSE students an interactive revision experience.

The post Offering AI-powered interactive revision with Oxford Revise Exam Tutor appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>

In March, we announced the launch of Oxford Revise Exam Tutor, an AI-powered tool designed to support GCSE revision.

Developed in association with ExamJam by Atypical AI, a global technology company specializing in assessment, AI tutoring, and generative AI, the digital tutor pilot is free for the 2025 summer exam period and complements the award-winning .

Focused on AQA GCSE Science initially and based on Oxford Revise鈥檚 best-selling 鈥楰nowledge, Retrieval and Practice鈥 approach, Exam Tutor breaks down topics into manageable chunks to aid revision. Throughout the process students are guided by an interactive digital tutor who is on hand for any questions. Over thousands of quick-fire digital flashcards support active retrieval practice and students can tackle exam-style questions and receive instant marking and feedback. The Exam Tutor also provides exam tips, personalized recommendations for further revision, and clear percentage-based tracking.

The launch of Exam Tutor comes after identified that one in two teenagers found generative AI helped them to understand and learn new things.

Becki Bradshaw, Head of Revision and Test Practice in our Education division, said: 鈥淲e know young people are seeking trusted AI revision tools which are based on high-quality, authoritative content. Students and parents alike can be confident that the Exam Tutor harnesses the best in generative AI whilst drawing on our award-winning, expert Oxford Revise Revision Guides. We are committed to ensuring that the Exam Tutor alongside Oxford Revise, remains a trusted companion to revision success and ensures all students are equipped with the tools, skills and confidence to succeed in their exams.鈥

Atypical AI’s ExamJam platform is an industry-leading technology solution for the education sector, enabling publishers to bring tailored learning to students, powered by the latest AI.

Bethanie Drake-Maples, Founder and CEO of Atypical AI, notes that our partnership presents the best of human-centred AI for learning: By combining our award-winning technology, which focuses on connecting humans and scaling learning science, with 糖心VLOG Press鈥 trusted and high-quality learning materials, 飞别鈥檙别 adapting AI to fit real student needs. Our platform鈥檚 personalized tutoring and assessment tools dynamically adapt to each learner鈥檚 individual strengths and needs, driving a meaningful connection and measurable results, and students and parents are loving it.

The Exam Tutor pilot is for AQA Science initially. Students can sign up for free for the summer 2025 exam period .

The post Offering AI-powered interactive revision with Oxford Revise Exam Tutor appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>
Streamlining legal research with Oxford Law Pro /news/streamlining-legal-research-with-oxford-law-pro/ Wed, 14 May 2025 08:38:36 +0000 /?p=5101 We are pleased to have launched Oxford Law Pro, a new knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers.

The post Streamlining legal research with Oxford Law Pro appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>

We are pleased to have launched Oxford Law Pro, a new knowledge resource for legal professionals and researchers.

Oxford Law Pro brings together more than 9,000 journal articles and over 600 award-winning, peer-reviewed books from our portfolio of authoritative and timely legal analysis, in key areas ranging from technology regulation to intellectual property law. Available alongside this research is听鈥攕hort-form commentary from industry experts about critical topics impacting legal practice, such as environmental science, ESG, and technology.

Oxford Law Pro marks a milestone in our commitment to supporting the legal community by ensuring innovation and excellence in legal research.听

Merel Alstein, Head of Acquisition for Professional & Law, said:

鈥淲e鈥檙e proud to support legal professionals right from their studies all the way to advising their clients. OUP has a stellar reputation in legal research because of the quality, originality, and breadth of our content. Our books, journal articles, and short form pieces are written by leading practitioners and thinkers in their fields, ensuring that our resources are both deeply reliable and at the cutting edge of new developments.

鈥淲e are excited to help lawyers, legal advisers, and general counsel speed up their research and further improve the quality of their work.鈥

Hosted on , Oxford Law Pro is powered by a conversational AI research assistant, making听legal research more efficient without compromising on accuracy. The tool navigates our quality-assured legal research content to deliver precise summaries, source links, and relevancy scores. It only returns trusted OUP sources, allowing researchers and legal professionals to expand their expertise by interrogating an unrivalled collection of legal research resources.

We have taken a responsible approach to investing in AI capabilities by integrating them into our existing products with a focus on trust, quality, and control, to further our publishing mission. Developed with Silverchair, the assistant is the latest addition to our line of AI-powered tools for researchers.

John Campbell, Product Strategy Director for our Academic division, said:

鈥淥xford Law Pro strengthens OUP鈥檚 position as a leading legal publisher and represents the qualities 飞别鈥檙别 recognized for: leadership, trust, integrity, and peer-reviewed insight. We want to support a responsible and sustainable future for AI tools in the research community, so we only develop tools that solve the problems of our customers and users.

鈥淎I tools should work alongside expert human input, identifying the relevant content you need and making your discovery of scholarship quicker, whatever your specialism. With Silverchair, we鈥檝e taken great care in ensuring Oxford Law Pro鈥檚 AI assistant is trustworthy thanks to the experts that are tuning and testing it. It鈥檚 not simply a black box being put in front of customers; it adheres to our editorial reputation and the excellence they expect from our products.鈥

Merel continues:

鈥淔or lawyers, accuracy is everything. Credibility rests on having access to reliable information鈥攔isking hallucinations and bias through low-quality AI tools is not an option. We want to equip legal professionals with original thinking supported by our strong, global academic connections on an easy-to-use platform, with AI tools that work with them. We are excited to see what lawyers can achieve with Oxford Law Pro.鈥

You can find out more about Oxford Law Pro .

The post Streamlining legal research with Oxford Law Pro appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>
Exploring topical global issues with original, interdisciplinary research /news/exploring-topical-global-issues-with-original-interdisciplinary-research/ Thu, 20 Mar 2025 16:01:14 +0000 /?p=4912 We are pleased to have published the first two collections of original interdisciplinary research in Oxford Intersections.

The post Exploring topical global issues with original, interdisciplinary research appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>

The global issues we face today present the world with multi-faceted challenges and demand a corresponding breadth of response and research.听

Recognizing this demand, we are pleased to have published the first topics鈥AI in Society and Racism by Context鈥攊n our new online series of original, interdisciplinary research, .

Sophie Goldsworthy, Director of Content Acquisition and Strategy, said:

“We’re excited to be going live with the launch of Oxford Intersections. In today’s polarized world, we believe it is ever more important to bring together the best thinkers and liveliest voices from different fields, to develop a more holistic understanding of the most pressing issues we face, such as the impact of racism and AI. Oxford Intersections provides a new route for researchers to address these challenges, connecting new work across discipline boundaries and underlining its real-world relevance for users of all kinds, from students and scholars to policy- and decision-makers.鈥

Sophie Goldsworthy

Oxford Intersections takes an expansive approach, drawing on the very best of current research from multiple disciplines, such as political science, philosophy, law, history, and literature. Overseen by a General Editor, each intersection is curated by leading academic and global experts across the humanities and social sciences.

The AI in Society intersection explores how AI continues to transform the world, addressing challenges such as creativity and the precarity of human connection, and regulatory and governance issues with AI-driven sustainability in the energy sector.

Philipp Hacker, General Editor of AI in Society and Chair for Law and Ethics of the Digital Society at European University Viadrina, Germany, said:

鈥淎I is shaping, for better or for worse, every aspect of society, from policymaking to everyday interactions. Understanding its societal impact from a multitude of perspectives and disciplines is critical, which is what AI in Society aims to do.鈥

Exploring the layered and multidimensional nature of racism, Racism by Context tackles subjects such as genomics, race and the persistence of health inequities, and the racialization of young Black people鈥檚 bodies in school settings.

Speaking about the important of analyzing these topics through different lenses, Meena Dhanda, General Editor of Racism by Context and Professor of Philosophy and Cultural Politics at University of Wolverhampton, UK, said:

鈥淐ombatting racism requires an unflinchingly analytical understanding of the roots, the history, the manifestation, the mechanisms, the proliferation, and the entanglement of its many forms within institutions and practices across all spheres of human interaction. Racism by Context has undertaken this enormous challenge by bringing into conversation cutting-edge research from different global locations.

鈥淭his is the first time that subject experts across a whole range of disciplines have come together to produce a comprehensive understanding of racism. We hope that the research curated informs decision-makers, and stimulates readers to reckon with and imaginatively oppose systemic, structural, and overt racism, wherever it occurs.鈥

Further intersections due to launch in 2025 and 2026 include Borders, Environmental Change and Human Experience, Gender Justice, and Social Media in Society and Culture, with over 30 more to follow. New research will be rapidly integrated into each intersection over the course of three years, ensuring readers can access the most comprehensive and current thinking.

You can access Oxford Intersections via our online platform for academic research, .

The post Exploring topical global issues with original, interdisciplinary research appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>
How are researchers responding to AI?听 /news/how-are-researchers-responding-to-ai/ Thu, 23 May 2024 07:34:36 +0000 /?p=2888 We heard from over 2,000 researchers about their excitement for and concerns about AI in research.

The post How are researchers responding to AI?听 appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>

Most academic researchers and research authors say they are using artificial intelligence (AI) tools in their research practice, despite concerns over the loss of critical thinking skills, respect for intellectual property (IP) rights, and mistrust in AI providers.

We recently conducted a across geographies, subject disciplines鈥攊ncluding Humanities, STM, and Social Sciences鈥攁nd different career stages to hear directly from the research community about how they are reacting to and using AI in their work.

The results reveal the key considerations in researchers鈥 decisions to engage with AI, including what excites and concerns them, and how they already use鈥攐r plan to use鈥攖ools already available to them.

At OUP, we are committed to supporting academic researchers in harnessing AI to improve research outcomes and help to protect their role by working closely with technology providers to define clear principles for future collaboration.

Speaking about the research, David Clark, Managing Director of our Academic division, said:

鈥淭hroughout OUP鈥檚 history we have embraced new opportunities offered by technological advancement鈥攊n line with our mission to publish rigorous, high quality academic resources鈥攔esponding to the needs of the academic community, while ensuring that the scholarship we publish remains valued and protected.

鈥淭his research will help us to understand how researchers are thinking about AI and its use in their work. As these technologies continue to rapidly develop, our priority is in working with research authors and the broader research community to set clear standards for how that evolution should take place.鈥

Our key findings include:

1. Majority say they have used some form of AI

76% said they have used a form of AI tool in their research鈥攚ith machine translation and chatbots being the most popular.

3. Vast majority say they are suspicious of AI companies

Only 8% trust that AI companies will not use their research data without permission, while just 6% said they trust companies to meet their data privacy and security needs.

5. Fears about intellectual property

3 in 5 respondents feel that the use of AI in research could undermine intellectual property, and result in authors not being recognized appropriately for use of their work.

鈥淚鈥檓 worried about the threat to IP, the increasing likelihood of inaccurate information, and poor custody of sources鈥

7. Generational differences in researchers’ opinions of AI

A quarter (25%) of those in the early stages of their careers have reported having sceptical or challenging views of AI. However, this proportion falls to 19% among respondents who are later in their careers. Early career researchers also have more divisive opinions on AI, with fewer expressing neutral views than later career researchers.

9. Confusion around available guidance

46% said that the institution they work at does not have a policy on AI usage in their work, and an additional 26% said they did not know if there is a policy.

2. Over 2 in 3 have felt the benefits of using AI

Of the respondents who have already used AI in their research, 67% feel it has benefitted them in some way. 27% of all respondents are excited for the prospects of AI for academic research, with data analysis and surfacing content seen as ways which it could potentially improve research outcomes.

“Because I am not a native speaker, I receive writing and language editing benefits”

4. Concerns about AI affecting research quality

Half (50%) said they are concerned about the impact that AI could have on academic research in the future. While 37% agreed that AI would save time for researchers, only 19% said that AI would improve the overall quality of work.

6. AI may reduce critical thinking skills

Across all subject disciplines, 1 in 3 (32%) say they are concerned that AI will negatively affect researchers鈥 skills and 25% feel that AI technology reduces the need for critical thinking.

“Researchers coming up with AI may never learn basic skills and trust AI outputs too much”

8. Considering implications of AI use is important

69% feel it is important to fully assess the implications of using AI tools before using them in their own research. Only 1 in 10 (12%) said that they would not look for guidance on using AI in their work before using it.

10. More than half would look to academic societies for AI guidance

54% say they would look to academic societies for guidance on AI, with 43% saying they would look at their own institution, and 27% saying they would look to publishers.

Speaking on OUP’s commitment to supporting the research community, David Clark added:

“This is a fast-moving, complex area鈥攂ut we strongly believe that publishers like OUP are well positioned to act as a bridge between research authors and tech providers, making a real difference as these tools continue to evolve.

“We are actively working with companies developing LLMs, exploring options for both the responsible development and usage, to not only improve research outcomes, but also recognize the vital role that researchers have鈥攁nd must continue to have鈥攊n an AI-enabled world.鈥

From June 2024, we will be hosting to delve deeper into the topics covered in our research, bringing together academic research authors from across the world to discuss how those in the research community can work together to build a sustainable, AI-enabled future.

You can read more on this topic from David Clark in on how academic publishers and AI companies do not need to be enemies, and his on how publishers are uniquely positioned to advocate for the protection of researchers and their research within LLMs.

The post How are researchers responding to AI?听 appeared first on 糖心VLOG Press.

]]>